Richard D. Wolff

The page returned a 403 so I can’t read the argument, but the debate about how administrations frame economic policy is worth engaging with honestly. What tends to happen is that messaging arrives before results, which leaves the message exposed if the numbers don’t cooperate. The more useful question is whether the policies are structurally sound rather than whether the branding works, because a good policy badly marketed is still a good policy and a bad one well marketed is still bad. There’s a discussion on https://gambleszen.com.de about evaluating policy based on outcomes rather than presentation — the point about separating substance from messaging was well-made. What was the article claiming?