Economic Theory
Reviving Keynesianism: a Critique
The global crisis has undermined the neo-liberalist phase of capitalism that dominated the last 30 years of the world economy. It has likewise challenged the hegemony of neo-classical economics as the theoretical rationale of neo-liberalism's celebration of private enterprise and markets. The form this challenge takes is a revival of Keynesian economics.Class and Monopoly
Robert Pollin, Editor. Capitalism, Socialism, and Radical Political Economy: Essays in Honor of Howard J. Sherman. Cheltenham, UK and Northhampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishers, 2000, pages 154-176. Monopoly refers to a power or political process, whereas class refers to economic processes. This paper offers a systematic examination of the diverse possible relationships between monopoly power and class structure. The conceptual differentiation of power from class is central to the logic of our argument (Resnick and Wolff 1987, especially chapter 3).Too big to fail, too big to be privately owned
Richard Wolff speaks to Paul Jay about the troubled auto industry in the United States. He says the important question right now is whether the bondholders will be willing to give up their share for foreign shareholders and make the sacrifices necessary to make American auto companies survive. If they refuse, as many of them claim they will, then the only option will be bankruptcy. He also says that both GM and Chrysler are going to give their largely worthless shares to the fund for health-care programs insuring their workers.
Capitalism & Its Discontents
We begin with production and wealth. They grew fast in the US over the last 25 years, as capitalism’s boosters (from Bush on down) constantly celebrate. Yet polls show most people in the US to be unhappy—and wisely so—about the economy now and fearful about tomorrow. Real wages and salaries (i.e., adjusted for the prices people pay) in the US stopped their historic 150-year rise in the 1970s and have fallen since. Meanwhile, those same workers’ productivity rose; they produced ever more but got no more for doing so.
Marxian Class Analysis and Economics
Class analysis predates economics. Long before modern economics emerged, ancient Greek thinkers, for example, analyzed their society by classifying people into groups by wealth. They viewed understanding the relationships between classes as crucial to improving their society and debated whether wealth should be distributed equally. While class analysis has a long history, no single definition of class has prevailed.
Class and Economics
Class analysis predates economics. Long before modern economics emerged, ancient Greeks, for example, analyzed their society by classifying people into groups according to the wealth they owned or the incomes they received. Understanding relationships between rich and poor classes (and possible middle classes) struck them as crucial to improving their societies.Personal Debts and US Capitalism
There is no precedent in US -- or any other -- history for the level of personal debt now carried by the American people. Consider the raw numbers. In 1974, Federal Reserve data show that US mortgage plus other consumer debt totaled $627 billion. By 1994, the total debt had risen to $4,206 billion, and by 2004, it reached $9,709 billion. For the second quarter of 2005, the Fed announced that the nation's debt service ratio (debt payments as a percentage of after-tax income) was 13.6%, the highest since the Fed began recording this statistic in 1980.
The Riddle of Consumption
Shaun Hargreaves Heap recently reminded us (PAER no. 26, 2 August 2004) that The Affluent Society raises an issue as important today as when Galbraith wrote nearly fifty years ago. Why do consumers want ever more goods and services when the evidence suggests that more consumption delivers no greater happiness? Heap praises, discusses, and adds to Galbraith’s explanations for this riddle of consumption or what might better be called the fetishism of consumption.
The Critique of Economic Policy
Now more than ever, the watchword in economics is “policy.” “Decision-makers” demand – and sometimes pay well for – “the appropriate policy” to solve those economic problems that strike them as important. Economists interested in “practical relevance” respond by “applying” their theories to supply such a policy. What goes unquestioned is the plausibility of “policy” itself. Yet, the very notion of policy is questionable.
"Efficiency”: Whose Efficiency?
I. The concept of “efficiency” common to most contemporary economic theories holds that analysis can and should determine the net balance between positive and negative effects of any economic act, event, or institution. Sometimes, in practical economic applications, this same notion of efficiency refers to “cost-benefit” analysis. A quantitative measure of all the positive and negative effects of an economic act, event, or institution is undertaken to determine whether, on balance, the positives (benefits added up) outweigh the negatives (costs added up).


